Climate, Altruism, and Accountability: 5 Ways Kinetically Anchored Tokens Are About to Transform the Environmental Movement

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. With global temperatures on the rise and extreme weather events becoming more frequent, it is clear that we need to take action now to mitigate the impact of climate change. However, as the environmental movement has grown over the last century, so too has a growing concern that the government and corporate interests tasked with addressing climate change are failing to do so effectively.

This concern has been exacerbated by recent reports of greenwashing, where companies make exaggerated or false claims about their environmental impact. A large-scale sweep of websites by the European Commission revealed that 42% of companies were guilty of greenwashing. In addition, there is a declining level of confidence in government authenticity, with only 20% of Americans reporting that they have confidence in their government to do what is right always or most of the time.

This lack of trust in government and corporate interests has led to a growing demand for reliable evidence that investments in the environment are delivering a concrete impact. A report found that 75% of individuals look for concrete information about a charity’s achievements before deciding where to donate. Yet, despite controlling less than 5% of the wealth, 32% of Gen-Zers and 28% of Millennials have taken action to address climate change in the past year.

In response to these concerns, the concept of Kinetically Anchored Tokens (KATs) has emerged as a potential solution. Such a system was designed for both the donors and direct actors whose love for the planet drives them to effective deeds of climate altruism. Here are five reasons why KATs are poised to redefine the climate movement for the coming decade:

1. Authenticity & Stability

One of the major problems with blockchain assets, such as non-fungible tokens (NFTs), is that they lack stability and authenticity. KATs are designed to overcome these issues by using a highly sophisticated tailoring process called Kinetic Anchoring. Kinetic anchoring creates a procedurally established chain of reasoning and corresponding measures between a digital asset and aspects of mutually observable reality.

Rather than attempting to force every abstraction of value into a single value symbol, KATs allow individuals and communities to articulate their own meaningful value into a symbol, and then provide the means for that symbol to be evaluated by other actors in the market through a common framework of authentication. The result is a system that promises both an unprecedented degree of asset stability underwritten by concepts of locally authentic value and a frictionless means for those assets to normalize and scale within a rigorous, but highly dynamic framework.

2. Accountability

One of the major issues with the current environmental movement is the lack of accountability among self-interested intermediaries. KATs address this issue by using a proof-of-impact system that tracks the actual impact of environmental initiatives. For example, rather than measuring the number of trees planted, KATs track and are regularly updated with the kinetic impact of planting those trees, such as the amount of carbon sequestered or the reduction in air pollution.

This system ensures that environmental initiatives are actually delivering the intended impact, rather than just providing a marketing opportunity for companies to engage in greenwashing. By providing a clear and verifiable means of tracking impact, KATs increase transparency and accountability in the environmental movement.

3. Accessibility and Diversity of Opportunity

One of the major barriers to entry for individuals and communities looking to engage in the environmental movement is the high cost of participation. KATs address this issue by creating a decentralized platform that allows for easy and affordable participation.

For example, individuals and communities can create their own KATs to represent their environmental initiatives and then use the platform to connect with other actors in the market. This creates a network effect that makes it easier and more affordable for individuals and communities to participate in the environmental movement. Not only do KATs represent a major improvement to driving effective climate action, but they do also so by extending economic opportunity to hard working people in the poorest corners of the world.

4. Scalability

One of the major challenges facing the environmental movement is the need to scale impact. Though we ultimately know very little about the complexity of the climate and our planet, one thing that is self-evident is that it is complex beyond comprehension. Systems based on a model of centralized capital ingestion and redistribution has proven highly ineffectual, one study published by the Copenhagen Consensus showing that the for every $1 allocated to the framework of the Paris Climate accords, $0.11 of impact is generated. Large hierarchical distribution methods have a long and well proven record of underperformance relative to loose, incentive based models. 

KATs are designed to set the conditions for such models to emerge spontaneously in regions by creating the conditions for both demand and value to be articulated in highly localized contexts that are of direct and substantial significance to actors and donors. Such a system dramatically increases productive potential and the capacity for collaboration at distance. Collecting and effectively allocating assets on a global scale has KATs address this issue by creating a system that allows for the scalable exchange of value.

5. Low Friction

KAT design is informed by the same metaphysical principles which underpin nearly all of the most successful social systems we see across time. The most effective systems possess a high degree of adaptivity clustered around a solid core of axiomatic functions. This is the same pattern that can be seen in biology across all lifeforms, as well as social constructs such as the idea of free market economics, democratic government, or traffic systems. The true genius of KATs do not lie in a technical miracle, but rather a recombination of proven technologies in a manner that efficiently taps into the tremendous beauty, potential and love that human beings already possess. The 2022 annual world giving index reported that over 3 billion people said that they had helped a stranger in the previous year (Heslop). The tremendous potential to tap into humanities desire to serve each other and the environment already exists, KATs are simply a way of unlocking that potential.

Coming Soon!

Stabile Industries has recently concluded theoretical evaluations in collaboration with The Military College of South Carolina's Baker School of Business. KAT technology is now moving to practical application and the worlds first KATs will be hitting the market in the next few weeks. Initial mints will be aimed for uses in real estate, enhanced home training for dogs, and now the enhancement of environmental practices through tree planting. For updates on mint releases, purchasing options and instructions, please follow us on social media or subscribe to our blog to be the first to know. To check out more on the groundbreaking work to bring the climate movement into the new millennium visit The Evergreen Exchange for more information.

Works Cited

Courtnell, Jane. “What Is Greenwashing? 5 Signs to Spot and Stop Greenwashing.” Green Business Bureau, 13 Feb. 2023, greenbusinessbureau.com/green-practices/what-is-greenwashing-and-how-to-spot-it.

Funk, Cary. “Key Findings: How Americans’ Attitudes About Climate Change Differ by Generation, Party and Other Factors.” Pew Research Center, 26 May 2021, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/26/key-findings-how-americans-attitudes-about-climate-change-differ-by-generation-party-and-other-factors.

Herzberger, Lucky. “Donors More Likely to Give When They See Tangible Results.” DonorDirect, 28 July 2014, www.donordirect.com/blog/financial-management/donors-more-likely-to-give-after-seeing-tangible-results.

King, Heather, et al. “How Impact Data Changes the Way Donors Give (SSIR).” How Impact Data Changes the Way Philanthropic Donors Give, ssir.org/articles/entry/how_impact_data_changes_the_way_donors_give. Accessed 3 Apr. 2023.

Fearnow, Benjamin. “Millennials Have 4 Times Less Wealth Than Baby Boomers Did by Age 34.” Newsweek, 8 Oct. 2020, www.newsweek.com/millennials-control-just-42-percent-us-wealth-4-times-poorer-baby-boomers-were-age-34-1537638.

Heslop, Neil. “https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/caf_world_giving_index_2022_210922-final.pdf.” World Giving Index 2022 | CAF, www.cafonline.org/about-us/publications/2022-publications/caf-world-giving-index-2022. Accessed 4 Apr. 2023.

Lomborg, Bjorn. “Copenhagen Consensus Center | Copenhagen Consensus.” Copenhagen Consensus Center | Copenhagen Consensus, www.copenhagenconsensus.com. Accessed 4 Apr. 2023.